NATO and Article 5: The Transatlantic Alliance and the Twenty-First-Century Challenges of Collective Defense By John R Deni

NATO and Article 5qa

For much of the last 25 years NATO has focused on crisis managementin places such as Kosovo and Afghanistanresulting in major changes to alliance strategy resourcingforce structure and training Re embracing collective defense which lies at the heart of the Treaty of Washington s Article 5 commitment is no easy feat and not something NATO can do through rhetoric and official pronouncements Nonethelessthis shift is vitally necessary if the alliance is to remain the bulwark of Western defense and security Russia s illegal annexation of Crimea and its invasion of Ukraine have fundamentally upended the security environment in Europe thrusting NATO into the spotlight as the primary collective defense tool most European states rely upon to ensure their security Collective defense is one of the alliance s three core missions along with crisis management and cooperative security It is defined in Article 5 the most well known and arguably most important part of NATO s founding treaty which The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all Although all three missions are vital to the interests of NATO s many member states collective defense has become first among equals once again Howeverthree very significant hurdles stand in the way of the alliance and its member states as they attempt to re embrace collective defense These loosely correspond to an ends waysmeans construct First is the alliance s strategy toward Russia Is Russia an adversarya partnerneitheror both How should strategy and policies change to place the alliance and its members on solid ground when it comes to managing Russia Second are the ongoing disputes over resourcing and burden sharing In recent years it has become commonplace for American leaders to publicly berate European allies in an effort to garner contributions to the common defense How might the alliance better measure and equitably share security burdens Third is the alliance s readiness to fulfill its objectives Many allies have announced or are implementing increases in defense spending However governments of European NATO member states are strongly incentivized by domestic politics to favor acquisition of military hardware or spending on personnel salaries and benefitsusually at the expense of readiness The result is that NATO military forces risk quickly becoming hollow in a way that is often underappreciated which will prevent the alliance from fulfilling the collective defense promise inherent in Article 5 The book examines all such questions to assess NATO s return to collective defense and offer a roadmap for overcoming those challenges in both the short and long term NATO and Article 5 The Transatlantic Alliance and the Twenty First Century Challenges of Collective Defense

NATO and Article 5: The Transatlantic Alliance and the Twenty-First-Century Challenges of Collective Defense By John R Deni
153810704X
9781538107041
180
ebook
book nato and article 501
book nato and article 510
article 5 nato text
nato article 4 and 5
what is the nato article 5
nato article 5 book
nato article 5 meaning
nato article 5 definition
nato and article 5 book pdf
nato and article 5 book review
nato and article 5 book 2
nato and article 5 book 1
nato and article 5 book summary
nato article 5 ribbon
nato article 5 response
NATO and Article 5: The Transatlantic Alliance and the Twenty-First-Century Challenges of Collective Defense.